Non-lead 30 06?
#1
Posted 27 August 2008 - 11:27 AM
#2
Posted 27 August 2008 - 11:30 AM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#3
Posted 27 August 2008 - 11:36 AM
#4
Posted 27 August 2008 - 11:40 AM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#5
Posted 27 August 2008 - 06:01 PM
#6
Posted 27 August 2008 - 06:51 PM
Be that as it may, or may not be, Barnes has no control over what their wholesale customers will charge to make a buck. Barnes spoke the truth at the F&G hearings. If they have raised their wholesale prices, well they are the only game in town and have the right to participate in free enterprise as do we all. Where the hell are the other manufactures and their non-lead bullets? I've basically had to hang up my .204s because there is no good non-lead stuff available and probably won't be for a long time, if ever. The F&G Commission has basically made the .204 extinct because of the physics involved in creating a bullet heaver that 26 gr that will shoot because of the added length required to get a higher mass. Barnes is not responsible for this non-lead delimma. The ban has been here for eight months now and where are all of the bullets from the other manufactures? Barnes happened to be in the right place at the right time. I believe, even if we finally let Darwin do his job on the condors, that there will be a nation-wide ban on lead in the next five to ten years, or sooner. Lead is bad stuff and the push will be to do the ecologically right thing and ban lead, justified or not. Had Barnes not appeared and spoke truth, in my mind, the ban may have been delayed, but not stopped and no one would be developing lead alternatives except Barnes. SJ and I disagree on what was said by Barnes at that fateful F&G Commission hearing. I invite you all to go back and watch it once again. Perhaps John will re-post the link, although it really doesn't matter because it is a done deal however you me interpret what Barnes really said.Hey, I paid $64.95 for a box of 20 Federal Prem 110 gr TSX .270 wsm ammo at a local gun shop and it wasn't fun.SteveHThant's not what Barnes told the DFG Commission. They said their stuff was even cheaper as I remember.
#7
Posted 27 August 2008 - 06:59 PM
That's why I reload. Sorry but you got hosed along with most of California.Hey, I paid $64.95 for a box of 20 Federal Prem 110 gr TSX .270 wsm ammo at a local gun shop and it wasn't fun.
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#8
Posted 27 August 2008 - 07:05 PM
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But I repeat myself."--Mark Twain
#9
Posted 27 August 2008 - 07:06 PM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#10
Posted 27 August 2008 - 07:33 PM
Well post the link and let everyone decide, if anyone is really interested. Like I said, it really doesn't matter because it is a done deal. I've listened/watched it a dozen times trying to see what you and Heath saw/heard, but it just isn't there for me. Ears have been cleaned and had cataract surgery less the a year ago. Maybe I'm just not trying to find someone to blame because no hunters, even locals or very few, attended and spoke against the ban. It is now a reality so let's move on. Trying to burn Barnes at the cross won't change anything. If you insist, well I love a good game of ping pong.That's why I reload. Sorry but you got hosed along with most of California.
You really need to listen to that Fish and Game Commission meeting Steve. Either that or get your ears cleaned out.
#11
Posted 27 August 2008 - 07:44 PM
#12
Posted 27 August 2008 - 08:07 PM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#13
Posted 27 August 2008 - 08:34 PM
#14
Posted 28 August 2008 - 08:13 AM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#15
Posted 28 August 2008 - 07:41 PM
#16
Posted 28 August 2008 - 07:47 PM
#17
Posted 28 August 2008 - 07:49 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










