
I took it out for a test run today at the range. Not good...it turns out my hard drive camcorder is very recoil sensitive. I'm going to try a tape/camcorder next. Heck, I will just keep buying and returning them until I find one that works
Posted 15 August 2008 - 07:17 PM

I took it out for a test run today at the range. Not good...it turns out my hard drive camcorder is very recoil sensitive. I'm going to try a tape/camcorder next. Heck, I will just keep buying and returning them until I find one that works Posted 15 August 2008 - 07:20 PM
Posted 15 August 2008 - 07:25 PM
Yea, It's 30mm and Ernie said, it was his last one.Is that a 30mm tube?
Posted 15 August 2008 - 07:30 PM
Posted 15 August 2008 - 07:32 PM
Posted 15 August 2008 - 07:44 PM
Posted 15 August 2008 - 09:55 PM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
Posted 15 August 2008 - 10:41 PM
Posted 16 August 2008 - 06:35 AM
Posted 16 August 2008 - 07:23 AM
Ehd used a 22-250 which has more recoil then my 223 and his camera stayed focused.I did check out the mount from Cabelas, but it only comes fits 1" scope tubes.I'll check out the camera SJ mentioned and see what happens.It's funny you should write about the recoil. As soon as I saw your setup, my first thought was that there wasn't anything to catch the recoil shock. The person shooting the PCP guns doesn't have to worry about recoil. Cabela's sells a unit that mounts to the side of the stack. You could get it and adapt the recoil part to fit a scope mount if you have the tooling capacity. otherwise you are just going to screw up more cameras.db
Posted 16 August 2008 - 07:24 AM
Posted 16 August 2008 - 08:23 AM
Darren,This is the one that I mentioned Cabelas sells. I have one. It works but it takes a bit of getting use to since it sets out to the side instead of right on top.dbHas anybody tried this setup yet?http://www.deerridgeinnovations.com/If so, what are the reports?Darren
1.jpg 26.17K
5 downloads
Posted 16 August 2008 - 08:29 AM
Posted 16 August 2008 - 08:30 AM
Wrong one. The one I am referring to is the one above that isn't a scope mount. You could try to adapt it to fit on top. The setup Eric uses will probably work for a while depending upon the construction of the camera. But they aren't designed for someone taking a hammer to the all of the time. I would go for something to reduce the shock. I don't have the money they do to buy new cameras each time they break.Ehd used a 22-250 which has more recoil then my 223 and his camera stayed focused.I did check out the mount from Cabelas, but it only comes fits 1" scope tubes.
Posted 16 August 2008 - 08:32 AM
The base is mounted into a sliding sleeve that has two light-weight spring cushioners. One in front and the other aft.dbHeath,Here is a photograph I just took. I hope this makes it a bit easier to understand. It says a lot more than me trying to describe how it works.dbDoes it absorb recoil?
gun_mount_slider_resize_final.jpg 93.56K
43 downloads
Posted 16 August 2008 - 08:39 AM
Posted 16 August 2008 - 11:56 AM
Posted 16 August 2008 - 01:22 PM
Posted 16 August 2008 - 02:26 PM
Velcro strap on the arm. They have deliberately photographed it so you can't replicate the animal without seeing one in person.dbI went to Cabels's web site and looked that mount up. However, I can't determine how it mounts to the rifle?
Posted 16 August 2008 - 05:05 PM
A hammer? Ehd is shooting 243 with his mount and his camera is still ticking. Mine is 223 or 204.I checked around on cameras that do video. There a tons of them a couple years old in the $30-$60 range and the length of the video is only limited to the size of your memory card.But they aren't designed for someone taking a hammer to the all of the time. I would go for something to reduce the shock. I don't have the money they do to buy new cameras each time they break.
db
Posted 03 September 2008 - 08:01 PM
Posted 03 September 2008 - 08:20 PM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
Posted 03 September 2008 - 08:37 PM
Posted 03 September 2008 - 08:58 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users