Remington 700 VSSF .22-250
Posted 16 April 2012 - 06:07 PM
Posted 16 April 2012 - 08:06 PM
True'r words were never spoken. Too many folks get hung up on manuals as being Gospel, and they are NOT. Actual velocities can, & do vary by a LOT sometimes. I have chrono'd or seen chrono'd a specific load through 2 or more different rifles with as much as 300+ fps difference; semi often! I've shown this to older folks (like me) at the range, only to see their jaw nearly break when hitting the bench. It's like, REALLY? They've been doing this how long & didn't know? My friend Badcoyote's 223 gets 200 fps higher velocity than my 223 with the same load. And is why I hate him! LOL (j.k.) In other words, my very respectable 223, 40gr Nosler load at just under 3800 fps, is right at 4,000 fps from his 223. And his rifle is INSANELY accurate to boot. My 35 gr Nosler lead free is 100 fps faster than the 40gr, & 300 fps faster than the 40gr from my 250. I've said this before, but will say it again. IMO, the Nosler & Hodgdon reloading "GUIDES" are two of the best going & are closest to actual #'s, in terms of accuracy & velocities. And I've owned / own most of them AND their numerous editions... Lynman, Hornady, Speer, Handloader magazine/pet loads etc.Good stuff / thread
the reloading manuals recommended loads are just that...recommended.... according to the manual I should of been right about 3600...my first shot thru it read 3300, second shot was about the same.
Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:06 AM
Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:18 AM
Cool. And I agree. If you're happy with it, that's all that matters.From a hunting stand point and most shots you'll take...doesn't matter in the slightest. A critter wouldn't know what hit em. 3400-3500fps is no joke. For a lot of years I never knew what fps my stuff was going and actually didn't really care. Never even shot groups or was concerned with group sizes...I'd pick a load from the book, load up a 100 rounds, sight them in with 3 shots on a cardboard box and go hunt. Simple simon and it worked. Sometimes I'd even mix/match loads and bullets. Whatever I had at the time. I still do the same sometimes. Calling coyotes or jump shooting jacks, I grab whatever I have loaded at the time. Doesn't really matter.But, since this discussion took off in a more technical aspect I was commenting to that fact. A .223 tops out with a 50gr bullet pretty close to 3400 fps neighborhood but with about 7-8 grains less powder then a 22-250 shooting the same bullet/velocity. That would be about an extra 50-60 rounds per pound of powder if you were shooting a .223. And that lower powder charge in a .223 shooting the same velocity is going to be easier in the same size tube...which will help prolong barrel life.A 22-250 was developed for velocity. It takes off were the .223 ends...if you let it. With just a couple more grains of powder investment you'll be taking advantage of what it's all about.
A load that shoots a 50-grain bullet a consistent .4 MOA doesn't strike me as a waste of powder, especially when it's doing close to 3500 fps.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users