It won't hurt anything, just make for one really leaded up barrel quickly. I can imagine they would be great on rabbits or coyotes with the soft expanding lead, but it seems they will be heck on the elbow grease to clean. Especially when you consider how I put a couple hundred rounds out of the .357's and they still look just like they did after the same lead cleaning method mentioned earlier, and I couldn't really see any lead while cleanng them.I love Hornady bullets and am not trying to steer anyone clear of them. I just remember that we had a few guys on here that have just taken up reloading and wanted to let them (and everyone else) know how soft these bullets were and to stick with harder cast lead to avoid leading like this. And now I know better also. No harm, no foul, but just thought I would share/educate. Happy shooting.
Hornady LSWC, watch for leading
#1
Posted 02 April 2012 - 11:26 PM
It won't hurt anything, just make for one really leaded up barrel quickly. I can imagine they would be great on rabbits or coyotes with the soft expanding lead, but it seems they will be heck on the elbow grease to clean. Especially when you consider how I put a couple hundred rounds out of the .357's and they still look just like they did after the same lead cleaning method mentioned earlier, and I couldn't really see any lead while cleanng them.I love Hornady bullets and am not trying to steer anyone clear of them. I just remember that we had a few guys on here that have just taken up reloading and wanted to let them (and everyone else) know how soft these bullets were and to stick with harder cast lead to avoid leading like this. And now I know better also. No harm, no foul, but just thought I would share/educate. Happy shooting.
#2
Posted 03 April 2012 - 04:23 AM
#3
Posted 03 April 2012 - 08:12 AM
#4
Posted 03 April 2012 - 09:43 AM
#5
Posted 03 April 2012 - 12:15 PM
I don't feel so bad now. My grandfather had an old Model 28 S&W that looked like a shotgun (smoothbore) and we just thought the barrel had been shot out. That was ntil Outers first came out with that Foul-Out years ago! We probably removed 1/2 pound of lead since he casted pure wheel weights (too soft) almost exclusively. This gun is the same reason I don't buy into the whole Glock rumor about high pressures and lead bullets. The whole idea behind that theory is that that particuliar style of rifling is supposed to foul out a barrel faster and the lead deposited in the barrel will raise pressures enough to cause damage. Well, if that old S&W with that much fouling would still shoot Magnums with copper jackets (which create higher pressures to begin with) without so much as a sticky case (ejcting) or a flattened primer, I find it amazingly hard to believe lead bullets with a fouled barrel in a Glock will. Lead bullets are 99.9% associated with reloading, and every manufacturer to date recommends not using reloads in their firearms. A CYA thing if you will. My best friend/hunting partner carries a Glock 27 on his CCW and had the same question. But after I took it off of him and put a coule hundred rounds through it one afternoon and dared him to pull lead out of the barrel, he now shoots lots of lea. And it is S C A R Y accurate out of his tiny barreled gun. This is also why I use hard cast lead. I have shot the Lasercast through 8' wood poles and recovered the bullets in the sand behind it, and except for the rifling marks, I could reload them again and shoot them. Next best thing to shooting copper.I have not tried the Bear Creek bullets, but they seem to be on the right track after reading up on their site. Most all manufacturers are using harder alloys these days (well, at least one isn'tOne revolver was leaded up so bad you could not cock the hammer back or turn the cylinder by hand. (of course my addiction to speed had nothing to do with it) <_<Anyway, after doing that several times (
),
#6
Posted 03 April 2012 - 01:23 PM
Uh, well... Murcury worked back then... only from what I've heard thoughThat was ntil Outers first came out with that Foul-Out years ago! We probably removed 1/2 pound of lead since he casted pure wheel weights (too soft) almost exclusively.
#7
Posted 03 April 2012 - 05:24 PM
Uh, well... Murcury worked back then... only from what I've heard though
![]()
#8
Posted 03 April 2012 - 06:21 PM
I can not picture you shooting a wadcutter at 0mph Frank. That must have been like Chinese water torture for you
#9
Posted 05 April 2012 - 08:51 PM
#10
Posted 06 April 2012 - 09:28 PM
While I do understand what you are saying, these Hornady bullets are the same size as he hard cast I usually use (with no leading problems). And this last batch was less than 75 rounds fired with 5.5gr of Bullseye moving at the speed of any line at a government agency (almost backwards). Way too much leading for that few rounds, especially at those speeds, That's why I just thought I would let everyone else in on what I learned the hard way (or actually, the soft way)But I shoot the at slower speeds that are lead friendly. The only leading problem that Ive had was found to be caused by a loose bore to bullit fit. Once I started loading correctly sized bullits, no more leading.
#11
Posted 07 April 2012 - 07:01 AM
OMG... I'm starting to get a rashBut I shoot the at slower speeds
#12
Posted 07 April 2012 - 11:36 AM
#13
Posted 07 April 2012 - 01:20 PM
#14
Posted 07 April 2012 - 03:04 PM
#15
Posted 07 April 2012 - 03:08 PM
Thats certianly slow enough! Have you measured them to see if that batch was undersized? I know if I pour bullits too cold they come out undersized. DRWhile I do understand what you are saying, these Hornady bullets are the same size as he hard cast I usually use (with no leading problems). And this last batch was less than 75 rounds fired with 5.5gr of Bullseye moving at the speed of any line at a government agency (almost backwards). Way too much leading for that few rounds, especially at those speeds, That's why I just thought I would let everyone else in on what I learned the hard way (or actually, the soft way)
.
#16
Posted 07 April 2012 - 03:38 PM
They are cold swaged, but yes I did check, and they are at .430. But I do hear ya on what you were thinking. I did spend some time last night doing some much more detailed research after talking with a fellow shooter. It turns out these were originally made with CAS in mind, which would explain the lack of need for a canalure or crimp groove with those intended speeds. And while I don't have a hardness scale, I can tell you that with pliers or a vise they crush as soft as my "know-to-be-soft" wadcutters, and and WAY softer then a few hard cast I had laying around. Like I said, they do shoot just fine, but if you have (a lack of) gun cleaning motivation like I do then I would definitely stick to a harder bullet. I think I'll save the other 125 rounds for the next time my buddy shows up with the .44 but only has "a couple of rounds, unless you want to let me shoot some of your reloads?"Thats certianly slow enough! Have you measured them to see if that batch was undersized? I know if I pour bullits too cold they come out undersized. DR
#17
Posted 07 April 2012 - 07:02 PM
Now thats just Evil!I think I'll save the other 125 rounds for the next time my buddy shows up with the .44 but only has "a couple of rounds, unless you want to let me shoot some of your reloads?"
![]()
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










