6.jpg 13K
2 downloads
IMG_0356.JPG 25.32K
2 downloads
Posted 08 March 2012 - 03:40 PM
6.jpg 13K
2 downloads
IMG_0356.JPG 25.32K
2 downloads
Posted 08 March 2012 - 06:39 PM
Posted 08 March 2012 - 06:41 PM
Posted 08 March 2012 - 07:16 PM
Posted 08 March 2012 - 09:08 PM
Posted 08 March 2012 - 11:26 PM
Posted 09 March 2012 - 01:15 PM
I agree. Check this^^^You slid the scope back too far and the front of the scope is now tilted upwards.That front ring sure looks awful close to where it starts to bell open, are you sure part of that taper isn't in the ring making it sit higher than it should? That would be my bet, an makes the most sense.
Posted 09 March 2012 - 03:08 PM
Posted 09 March 2012 - 06:09 PM
He didnt change his base or rings. Just slid the scope back in the rings and now it wont zero.Did you accidentally get 20 MOA base instead of normal base?
Posted 09 March 2012 - 06:13 PM
Ring Height has nothing to do with your point of impact. Ring height should be set to the position of the shooters eye when you have good/consistant cheek-weld.Get higher scope rings...I am not sure what caliber you are shooting, but the bullet's trajectory arch will vary by caliber/weight. It looks cool sitting right off your barell, but I have a really good feeling(speaking from experience) that the higher scope rings will benefit you.
Posted 09 March 2012 - 08:10 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users