Hunting with non-hunter friends
#1
Posted 27 October 2011 - 09:18 PM
#2
Posted 27 October 2011 - 09:26 PM
#3
Posted 28 October 2011 - 10:26 PM
#4
Posted 29 October 2011 - 08:45 AM
#5
Posted 29 October 2011 - 10:15 AM
Interesting theory, DD. And in a perfect theoretical world, the game warden will just take his word for it that he is merely an armed hiker accompanying a licensed hunter and does not fall under any interpretation of DFG Code, Section 86. "Take" means hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill.You don't have to pull the trigger to be 'hunting'. I'd tell this friend to either bring a camera instead of his rifle or buy a darned license to support the sport or stay home.It is not Illegal to accompany a friend. You are allowed to have friends, and your friends are allowed to be your friend. DFG cant tell you that you can only hang out/hike with friends that are licensed hunters.It is not illegal to carry a gun either. Your friend can carry a gun and walk around with you in the wilderness without a hunting lic. As long as he is not shooting any animals, then he is not hunting.
#6
Posted 29 October 2011 - 10:51 AM
Q: Who needs a hunting license?A: A California hunting license is required for any person taking birds or mammals. Hunters must carry licenses and be prepared to show them on request. Fish and Game Code, Section 86 defines “taking” as hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill.
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#7
Posted 29 October 2011 - 11:51 AM
#8
Posted 29 October 2011 - 01:22 PM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#9
Posted 29 October 2011 - 02:47 PM
Ditto flushing and retreving is helping you hunt.Your thrashers could be cited for doing what they are doing as that's pursuing or even harassing game.
#10
Posted 29 October 2011 - 03:41 PM
My friend would be more than happy to buy a license if it was just a matter of cost (Heck I'd probably buy one for him, if that was the problem). But he's not sure about going through the hunter's ed classes before he knows if he has any interest in hunting. I guess I'll suggest that he bring a camera to tag along...then after a few trips maybe getting the hunter safety/license will be an easier sell.Interesting theory, DD. And in a perfect theoretical world, the game warden will just take his word for it that he is merely an armed hiker accompanying a licensed hunter and does not fall under any interpretation of DFG Code, Section 86. "Take" means hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill.You don't have to pull the trigger to be 'hunting'. I'd tell this friend to either bring a camera instead of his rifle or buy a darned license to support the sport or stay home.
#11
Posted 29 October 2011 - 03:56 PM
A $30, eight hours class (where he may learn some interesting stuff), and a $50 license is a much smaller price to pay to be perfectly legal than any other option. Plus they could then carry whatever they want and do whatever they want, like flush, retrieve, and even hunt if so desired.My friend would be more than happy to buy a license if it was just a matter of cost (Heck I'd probably buy one for him, if that was the problem). But he's not sure about going through the hunter's ed classes before he knows if he has any interest in hunting.
#12
Posted 29 October 2011 - 04:25 PM
#13
Posted 29 October 2011 - 04:29 PM
That is a great suggestion! I think that would be the perfect level of motivation!Take em' out, show them how much fun it is hunting, then go to hand him/her the rifle, and then stop and say, "Wait, you don't have a hunting license, I can't let you shoot". Then I bet they get their license by the next outting.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









