I figured it would be fun to see what you all prefer in terms of these two European originated polymer framed 9mms. It's a pretty common question as they have similar features and can be had fir similar prices. I have both, and I'd have to go with the HK USP for all of it's features and (in my case) slightly better accuracy. I'll let others go more in depth to the debate, but that's what I think. Your turn.
Which one do you all prefer?
Started by
hunting guy
, Dec 27 2010 06:30 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 27 December 2010 - 06:30 PM
Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail. Ralph Waldo Emerson
#2
Posted 27 December 2010 - 06:53 PM
I had a HK USP 9mm and I loved it. I only sold it to buy a shorter 1911 for CCW. I'd like to buy another in a 45 someday. As far as glocks go, they are the ugliest things in the world and I would never own one for that reason.
#3
Posted 28 December 2010 - 06:50 AM
HK makes a fine pistol. Glocks are good too but just do not have the features the HK does. Isn't the HK quite a bit more $$$ than the Glock?
#4
Posted 28 December 2010 - 12:06 PM
TheHK really isn't much more than a glock. The Hk USP can be had in 9 or 40mm for $700 at CDNN while the Gluck can be gas for slightly less depending on where you buy.
Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail. Ralph Waldo Emerson
#5
Posted 09 January 2011 - 02:37 PM
I have them in both 9mm and .45, and I love them.I put well over 2000 rds of Blazer 9mm through one and it never skipped a beat.I never liked the way the Glock felt in my hand so USP for me.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










