The fish that lost a million dollars
#1
Posted 24 June 2010 - 04:49 PM
#2
Posted 24 June 2010 - 05:40 PM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#3
Posted 24 June 2010 - 08:17 PM
#4
Posted 24 June 2010 - 08:50 PM
#5
Posted 24 June 2010 - 09:35 PM
#6
Posted 25 June 2010 - 12:07 AM
#7
Posted 25 June 2010 - 02:43 AM
#8
Posted 25 June 2010 - 09:13 AM
#9
Posted 25 June 2010 - 10:24 AM
#10
Posted 25 June 2010 - 10:27 AM
#11
Posted 25 June 2010 - 11:00 AM
I feel the same way! The kid just works on the boat he isn't catching the fish, he's just a deckhand. The tournament fisherman need the licenses. I'll bet a third of the deckhands on deep sea outings don't have licenses. It's a stupid clause and it was the Captains responsibility to be sure his boat met the requirements of the tournament. He is supposed to know the rules and make sure everything is ship shape not some lowly deckhand.I wonder if what this kid says is true, "But he also said the owners and the captain — who were paying him $500 a week before taxes — never told him that he needed a valid fishing license to be part of the team". If so, I can't see why everyone is coming down so hard on the guy. Seems to me like the Captain of the ship should be responsible for all this. Sorry to say but with empowerment comes big responsibility. I wouldn't expect a temp deckhand to know all the rules but I WOULD expect the Captain to!
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#12
Posted 25 June 2010 - 02:58 PM
#13
Posted 25 June 2010 - 07:58 PM
#14
Posted 25 June 2010 - 08:16 PM
I guess the captain should know something like that, wouldn't you think?I'm not sure but I think the law is that if you help with the catch in any way you need to have a license.
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#15
Posted 25 June 2010 - 08:55 PM
I myself would never have guessed a deckhand needed a fishing license. Do processing plant employees need a hunting license to kill cows before they slaughter them. It's not done for recreation, it's done as part of a job.The gaffing part I can maybe see as part of actually catching it, maybe. I don't see it as any different than someone w/o a license tossing you a bird you already shot but was not dead and can't fly away. He didn't shoot it or kill it, they just tossed it to you. I work for an insurance repair company. As the general contractor on a job, it is up to us to make sure our license and certs, our employees licenses and certs, and our vendors licenses and certs are always up to date and current. Period. You're in charge, YOU make sure.I'm not sure but I think the law is that if you help with the catch in any way you need to have a license. I have never been on a boat without a deckhand chumming ,gaffing of handling some part of the fishing in anyway.
#16
Posted 26 June 2010 - 03:14 PM
Thats the law in California but not necessarily in other states.I'm not sure but I think the law is that if you help with the catch in any way you need to have a license. I have never been on a boat without a deckhand chumming ,gaffing of handling some part of the fishing in anyway.
#17
Posted 26 June 2010 - 05:19 PM
Very true.Thats the law in California but not necessarily in other states.
#18
Posted 02 July 2010 - 08:24 PM
#19
Posted 02 July 2010 - 08:26 PM
Cows are not a game animalI myself would never have guessed a deckhand needed a fishing license. Do processing plant employees need a hunting license to kill cows before they slaughter them. It's not done for recreation, it's done as part of a job.
#20
Posted 04 August 2010 - 10:31 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










