Noob with .223 - what range to sight in for yotes?
#31
Posted 12 July 2010 - 12:31 AM
#32
Posted 12 July 2010 - 04:10 AM
Is your rifle grouping well with that particular load? Even an MOA rifle should have no problem putting all the shot inside the 4" circle at 200 yards, if you do your part. You need to shoot more often. Practice, practice and practice some more!!!!!!!!!Hmm...shot at 100, 150, 200. 2" bullseye. Things look pretty good (inside 4") @ 100, 150, fall apart at 200, probably me. Course it was hot, heat waves, little breeze, forgot to put ribbons up.
#33
Posted 12 July 2010 - 06:21 AM
#34
Posted 12 July 2010 - 07:29 AM
#35
Posted 01 August 2010 - 08:21 PM
#36
Posted 02 August 2010 - 06:26 AM
#37
Posted 02 August 2010 - 09:06 AM
#38
Posted 02 August 2010 - 09:17 AM
#39
Posted 02 August 2010 - 10:28 AM
Could be that...or a handful of other reasons. The further you go out expecting results, the more things get amplified. Wind becomes much more an issue the further you go out...along with other things.As DF pointed out, you need to minimize as much human error as possible when shooting groups. Stable platform and sandbags to rest your rifle on. Stable target stand. Known yardage. Hold the rifle the same everytime. Apply same shoulder pressure etc. If your target is getting blown over I wouldn't expect any real results. If I'm out hunting and just want a quick zero check I'll throw out a box at about a hundred, rest off something reasonably steady and shoot 3 shots. I'm not expecting cloverleafs...just making sure I'm in the hood.I believe Bushnell rifle scopes are parallex fixed at a 100. Leupold is at 150. A nicer scope might help you shoot a little better group at 200...but getting back to your original question...it will not matter much for coyote hunting.maybe that is why my groups are falling apart at 200.
#40
Posted 15 August 2010 - 10:32 PM
200 yards, one bag, prone, Speer GDSP 65grI think prone changed the position of my eye in relation to the scope = parallax change and/or the switch to 65 gr= more drop. Looking into getting some sort of cheek pad to help with consistent cheek weld.
#41
Posted 15 August 2010 - 11:35 PM
#42
Posted 16 August 2010 - 06:19 AM
#43
Posted 16 August 2010 - 07:06 AM
#44
Posted 16 August 2010 - 08:19 AM
No offense meant, but that really doesn't make a lot of sense. While I'm sure you shot a group at 200 that measured better then your previous effort at 100 it doesn't necessarily mean that the group shrank as the range increased...it probably meant that you just shot a better group that time around at 200. A better way of being certain would be to shoot at least 3 groups at a 100 then 3 groups at 200 and take an average. If you have a rifle that consistently prints 1" or above groups at a hundred I wouldn't expect too much improvement. Groups will not shrink as ranges increase (meaning a dimensioned 2" group at 100 will turn into a dimensioned 1" group at 200)... but "sometimes" MOA will shrink. What you're refering to is when a bullet "goes to sleep". Sometimes a bullet will find the right velocity/spin rate and smooth out or "go to sleep. It usually happens with VLD bullets made for long distance shooting and at longer ranges. For example.. what may shoot MOA at a 100 may again improve to 3/4 MOA at 200 (which is 1.571"). Bigger group but tighter MOA.To the original poster...those are not groups. They are an example of how well you shoot prone at 200 yards with some crappy ammo. There has been some good info already given about dialing in your gun. DF mentioned stable platform....start with that. Eliminate as much human error as possible...and buy some good ammo.Funny thing...some of the ammo that I shoot out of my .223 will shoot better groups at 200 yards than at 100. Meaning, at 100 yards I might shoot 1.5 inch groups and the same ammo will shoot 1 inch at 200 yards. Something to do with some bullets stabilizing better beyond 100 yards.
#45
Posted 16 August 2010 - 01:14 PM
#46
Posted 16 August 2010 - 02:07 PM
#47
Posted 16 August 2010 - 02:08 PM
Just keep setting the target back further till you are getting one hole groups...None taken at all...I should have mentioned that these groups were averages of several groups shot. I always thought the same as what you are talking about, I was just shooting better at 200 yards than at 100....until, I read an article (I think it was posted here) that showed testing of stabilization of bullets. Some of these bullets showed considerable wobble past 100 yards, but then would stabilize beyond that 100 yard mark. I thought it was a fluke, also. Most of my groups grow beyond 100 yards, but some do not. Also, with these particular bullets shooting smaller groups at 200 yards rather than 100 yards print very similar groups at 300 yards as all the other stuff I have shot at 300 yards. I misplaced my shooting binder during a recent move, otherwise I could tell you which bullets they were. But this was a consistant thing. Not to say that many variables come into play, but it was interesting to say the least.
#48
Posted 16 August 2010 - 02:27 PM
#49
Posted 16 August 2010 - 03:20 PM
Well, I have some HPs too...what's wrong with the SPs?Single six That has to be a joke your not expecting us to believe that's your hunting rounds.
#50
Posted 16 August 2010 - 05:48 PM
Your shotgun patterns pretty nice.
#51
Posted 16 August 2010 - 05:59 PM
I think what he is refering to is the grouping. Any rifle that shoots a 7"x6" grouping at 200 yards needs to be taken to the gunsmith for some work. It just isn't going to get it. And even the 3"X3" group on the second target isn't too good. You need to find some different ammo or a different rifle if that is the best it will do.Well, I have some HPs too...what's wrong with the SPs?
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But I repeat myself."--Mark Twain
#52
Posted 16 August 2010 - 06:40 PM
#53
Posted 16 August 2010 - 06:57 PM
#54
Posted 16 August 2010 - 07:14 PM
#55
Posted 16 August 2010 - 07:18 PM
#56
Posted 16 August 2010 - 07:22 PM
#57
Posted 16 August 2010 - 07:24 PM
#58
Posted 16 August 2010 - 07:34 PM
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But I repeat myself."--Mark Twain
#59
Posted 16 August 2010 - 07:37 PM
That's for bench shooter! You won't ever use one when hunting. That's just added weight you don't need. Use a sand bag or your off hand beneath the stock.If you're shooting off a bench with a bipod, what do you call that dealywhacker you can get that attaches to the rear sling mount? It has a threaded thumbscrew to adjust for elevation and folds up when not in use.Thanks
#60
Posted 16 August 2010 - 07:42 PM
Been shooting one bag and the off hand either under the tail of the stock or under the "pistol grip" part. It's been working OK @ 100, not so much at 200...I figure it folds up out of the way or removes when not in use, and it's lighter than a bag.However, I can see how 2 bags with the rifle nestled would be the most steady setup due to their weight and friction against the stock.That's for bench shooter! You won't ever use one when hunting. That's just added weight you don't need. Use a sand bag or your off hand beneath the stock.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










