transporting a handgun
#1
Posted 04 February 2010 - 01:27 PM
#2
Posted 04 February 2010 - 02:02 PM
#3
Posted 04 February 2010 - 02:10 PM
#4
Posted 04 February 2010 - 02:42 PM
#5
Posted 04 February 2010 - 05:31 PM
#6
Posted 04 February 2010 - 05:40 PM
Fellow Team Savage member and Team Ruger! Semper Fidelis!
NRA Certified Instructor / Multi-state CCW Instructor
#7
Posted 06 February 2010 - 12:59 AM
#8
Posted 06 February 2010 - 10:26 AM
#9
Posted 06 February 2010 - 12:36 PM
#10
Posted 06 February 2010 - 02:41 PM
#11
Posted 06 February 2010 - 06:30 PM
Perfectly legal in CA. Why would a cop hassle you for it?It's legal, but I would expect a lot of LEO's to hassle you about it.
#12
Posted 06 February 2010 - 06:33 PM
That is actually the old definition of "Loaded" in CA. A 2009 California Supreme Court Decision says the firearm must have an unexpended round in the firing chamber to make it a loaded firearm. It is now in line with the Fish and Game Code definition.It is legal for the purposes of the Penal Code.PC 12031:g) A firearm shall be deemed to be loaded for the purposes ofthis section when there is an unexpended cartridge or shell,consisting of a case that holds a charge of powder and a bullet orshot, in, or attached in any manner to, the firearm, including, butnot limited to, in the firing chamber, magazine, or clip thereofattached to the firearm; except that a muzzle-loader firearm shall bedeemed to be loaded when it is capped or primed and has a powdercharge and ball or shot in the barrel or cylinder. Just carry the mags in your pocket.
#13
Posted 06 February 2010 - 07:34 PM
Do you happen to have the name on that decision? I would like to read it. So if thats the case, then having a fully loaded magazine in the pistol and no unexpended round in the firing chamber, it is not considered "loaded"? And if so, then when a revolver's cylinder is loaded in all but the one cylinder hole in line with the barrel and hammer it would also be considered "unloaded"? As I understand the F&G code it allows one to have a rifle or shotgun inside a vehicle while on private property not open to the public, with rounds in the magazine and not in the chamber of the firearm. F&G Code Section 2006; It is unlawful to possess a loaded rifle or shotgun in anyvehicle or conveyance or its attachments which is standing on oralong or is being driven on or along any public highway or other wayopen to the public. A rifle or shotgun shall be deemed to be loaded for the purposesof this section when there is an unexpended cartridge or shell in thefiring chamber but not when the only cartridges or shells are in themagazine. The provisions of this section shall not apply to peace officersor members of the armed forces of this State or the United States,while on duty or going to or returning from duty.That is actually the old definition of "Loaded" in CA. A 2009 California Supreme Court Decision says the firearm must have an unexpended round in the firing chamber to make it a loaded firearm. It is now in line with the Fish and Game Code definition.
#14
Posted 07 February 2010 - 07:35 AM
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But I repeat myself."--Mark Twain
#15
Posted 07 February 2010 - 07:37 AM
Fellow Team Savage member and Team Ruger! Semper Fidelis!
NRA Certified Instructor / Multi-state CCW Instructor
#16
Posted 07 February 2010 - 09:28 AM
I agree wholeheartedly with you.While it may be legal to have a round in the chamber when on private property, it sure ins't a good idea.
#17
Posted 07 February 2010 - 02:55 PM
#18
Posted 11 February 2010 - 11:50 AM
#19
Posted 05 June 2010 - 07:54 AM
#20
Posted 05 June 2010 - 08:47 AM
Fellow Team Savage member and Team Ruger! Semper Fidelis!
NRA Certified Instructor / Multi-state CCW Instructor
#21
Posted 28 June 2010 - 08:42 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











