1.jpg 7.63K
22 downloads
Ugliness
#1
Posted 04 August 2009 - 11:06 AM
1.jpg 7.63K
22 downloads
#3
Posted 04 August 2009 - 11:23 AM
#4
Posted 04 August 2009 - 11:30 AM
#5
Posted 04 August 2009 - 11:51 AM
I notified Carlson's and Predator Sniper Styx Online Store (where I purchased it from). My 1st concern is that those who have bought a choke and not patterned it may be inadvertently wounding critters and the lesson to be learned from this is that you MUST PATTERN YOUR SHOTGUN. It is not my intention to injure Carlson but since so many people here recemmended this Dead Coyote Choke...I felt it important for them to know what I saw.Call Carlson's, they should replace that choke for you.
#6
Posted 04 August 2009 - 12:02 PM
#7
Posted 04 August 2009 - 12:34 PM
#8
Posted 04 August 2009 - 12:51 PM
Shot 4 different kinds of ammo (3", 2 3/4" in 00, #4 buck and #9 birdshot-Federal & Remington) and they all shot the same. Way right at 15 yards. (thanks for the correction, i corrected my original post)Pushed the sight as far as it would go (see pick) before removing it entirely. Not much difference.The DCC was in my brand new & unfired Winchester 1300 Speedpump. All the different shells performed well with the stock Imp Cyl choke. I don't know enough about aftermarket chokes to understand why the DCC won't shoot straight when the stock models do. If you say that's normal then my point is confirmed. You MUST PATTERN YOUR SHOTGUN.The same choke placed in a different gun will more than likely produce different results.The same choke used with different ammo will more than likely produce different results.The same choke used with the same ammo that uses a different wad will likely produce different results.Point is, nothing is exact and you have to take all things into consideration when patterning a shotgun. Ammo types, gun types, choke types, etc. will all affect patterning in different ways. It sounds crazy, but the type of wad that we use for reloading our own rounds for competition trap and skeet, makes a difference in how the gun patterns.The Dead Coyote Choke is obviously not the choke to be using in your particular shotgun, but I would lean toward the fact that there isn't anything wrong with that particular choke tube. As you already did, just try another one until you find what works best for your gun.What gun did you buy it for? I am certain will be able to sell it used in a matter of minutes.I do have a question about your use of adjusting the sights???? How did it come about that you could not get the pattern to move by adjusting a sight, which will in turn adjust your point of aim and impact? In theory it is pretty much impossible to adjust a sight and not move your point of impact..
Attached Files
#9
Posted 04 August 2009 - 02:40 PM
Do you have a rear sight on it? You may want to try out the modified choke if you have one, sometimes they work well with #4 Buck.Pushed the sight as far as it would go (see pick) before removing it entirely. Not much difference.
#10
Posted 04 August 2009 - 03:23 PM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#11
Posted 04 August 2009 - 03:40 PM
#12
Posted 04 August 2009 - 04:46 PM
#13
Posted 04 August 2009 - 07:20 PM
Real tractors have two cylinders and hand clutches.
My rifle is mine, it isn't for sale, and I only give guns to people that I really like.
#14
Posted 04 August 2009 - 10:28 PM
I agree...that's next. I do not feel right trying to sell the Dead Coyote choke to someone else primarily because I believe it to be defective and I don't wanna screw anyone. Perhaps they will exchange it for a straight shooting tube. Given the degree of error, I have to believe this is a defective unit.I'd try the original full choke that came with your gun. It might just surprise you.
#15
Posted 05 August 2009 - 10:06 AM
#16
Posted 05 August 2009 - 11:47 AM
#17
Posted 05 August 2009 - 12:29 PM
#18
Posted 05 August 2009 - 02:20 PM
How can they say that you made a slanderous statement? In the above posting you plainly stated that your post wasn't intended to do that. I'd say their course of actions did more harm to their good name than anything you might have said. It is understandable that occasionaly a product might make it out the door and not be up to snuff, it happens. But for the producer to not make it right is simply inexcusable.Your tube could still work in someone elses gun. The threads in another gun may be clocked a quarter turn in either direction which would put the pattern a tad high or low. Either way would be alot easier to deal with. Is that an invector or invector+ tube?I notified Carlson's and Predator Sniper Styx Online Store (where I purchased it from). My 1st concern is that those who have bought a choke and not patterned it may be inadvertently wounding critters and the lesson to be learned from this is that you MUST PATTERN YOUR SHOTGUN. It is not my intention to injure Carlson but since so many people here recemmended this Dead Coyote Choke...I felt it important for them to know what I saw.
Real tractors have two cylinders and hand clutches.
My rifle is mine, it isn't for sale, and I only give guns to people that I really like.
#19
Posted 05 August 2009 - 02:56 PM
#20
Posted 05 August 2009 - 03:45 PM
#21
Posted 05 August 2009 - 05:09 PM
#22
Posted 05 August 2009 - 06:01 PM
#23
Posted 05 August 2009 - 08:57 PM
I'm not 100% sure on this but if the threads are right near the muzzle it is a win-choke. If the threads are at the base of the choke it is an invector or invector plus. If it is in fact an invector plus it should be stamped on the barrel by the gauge and chamber length.As for Clampdaddy's question about it being an invector or invector+ tube...I can't say. Nothing on the packaging. i even had to call to inquire about the constriction because that info is deliberately left off the packaging as well. Their customer service guy said they didn't wanna advertise the .660 constriction to their competitors. Is there a way to tell just by looking at the tube?
Real tractors have two cylinders and hand clutches.
My rifle is mine, it isn't for sale, and I only give guns to people that I really like.
#24
Posted 05 August 2009 - 09:36 PM
#25
Posted 05 August 2009 - 09:59 PM
I believe Carlson's refers to Carlson's (Choke Tubes), not Bell & Carlson.... Bell & Carlson's...
#26
Posted 05 August 2009 - 10:29 PM
#27
Posted 06 August 2009 - 06:19 AM
This pretty much sums up this whole thread. Especially the end.Like i said, "The customer is always right...even when he's not."
#28
Posted 06 August 2009 - 07:57 AM
#29
Posted 06 August 2009 - 08:05 AM
No argument there. Actually I envisioned a simpler approach. Get some barrels and rig them up to a high pressure line with a small tissue pouch of shot to test fire the chokes. Safe, cheap, clean and reusable. Doesn't even need to match the velocity of a regular shell, just enough pressure to determine it's shooting straight. Then again, I am not in this business and don't knowIf i can throw in my
...Second, I think the idea of test firing each individual choke before packaging is an unrealistic idea. It would require considerable time and ammunition plus additional rifles and employees which would drive the prices up substantially. They seem to be fairly proud of their products already so I would hate to see any further inflation of their prices.
#30
Posted 06 August 2009 - 08:38 AM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











