ruger mk3 or buckmark for hunting
#1
Posted 27 January 2009 - 10:24 AM
#2
Posted 27 January 2009 - 11:24 AM
#3
Posted 27 January 2009 - 03:38 PM
#4
Posted 27 January 2009 - 04:42 PM
#5
Posted 28 January 2009 - 08:27 AM
#6
Posted 28 January 2009 - 09:11 AM
#7
Posted 28 January 2009 - 05:52 PM
#8
Posted 31 January 2009 - 06:07 PM
There's no need to put any aftermarket parts on them because they feel and shoot sooo nice right out of the box.
Real tractors have two cylinders and hand clutches.
My rifle is mine, it isn't for sale, and I only give guns to people that I really like.
#9
Posted 01 February 2009 - 07:04 PM
#10
Posted 01 February 2009 - 07:43 PM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#11
Posted 05 August 2009 - 09:39 PM
I'm planingg on purchasing a new SS Ruger MarkIII Hunter 6-7/8" flueted barrel in the next few days and was wondering what exactly you don't like about the loaded chamber indicator and the integral lock? Just because it's there and comes with the pistol or do you have a "specific" reason why?I have Ruger MKII,a 22/45,a MkI and a Buckmark. I am starting to prefer the Buckmark, it has a nicer trigger. I have been staying away from the MKIII's due to the loaded chamber indicator and integral lock I dislike.
#12
Posted 07 August 2009 - 05:09 PM
#13
Posted 07 August 2009 - 06:28 PM
#14
Posted 09 August 2009 - 09:30 AM
#15
Posted 09 August 2009 - 11:37 AM

#16
Posted 10 August 2009 - 04:25 PM
#17
Posted 12 August 2009 - 10:10 AM
#18
Posted 12 August 2009 - 11:11 AM
#19
Posted 12 August 2009 - 01:59 PM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
#20
Posted 12 August 2009 - 03:19 PM
#21
Posted 12 August 2009 - 07:33 PM
Time waits for no one--
treasure every moment you have.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









