Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
aquaelvis

Need help picking my next scope

14 posts in this topic

OK, so I need to get the AR scoped so i can take it out and get it bloody! I ordered the wilson tactical solid mount and now it is time to pick the scope. I am leaning towards Nikon- I dig the buckmaster that is on my Tikka. I am thinking about the:NIKON 6430 BKMASTER 3-9X50 PLX MT $246NIKON 6319 PROSTAFF 3-9X50 PLX RT $187I could go cheaper-Nikon 6320 PROSTAFF 3x9x40 bdc matte $125 I think the buckmaster 3-9x40 is around $168So I guess I am trying to figure out if the buckmaster is that much better than the prostaff and if the jump to 50mm objective is worth the money? On one hand I say, it is an AR and a carry around coyote gun so no need to be too fancy. On the other hand I think, as long as I am buying it- might as well buy better than I need rather than buying something I am not happy with. And it could always end up finding a home on another one of my rifles- so is it better to spend more now? But, the cheper way to go is only $125- going the better route doubles that! Is it worth twice the money? HELP!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First off I would check the eye relief on the scopes you refer to. Ihad a nikon and sold it because i lost eye relief when the power was turned up. Not good for a predator rifle. Second thing ill throw out there is that Leupold told me a 50mm doesnt let any more light in than a 40mm. Tube size will change that. So i would reccomend a 40 to get that scope height lower. JMHO..ehd..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any thoughts on the Bushnell 3200? Seems to be prices along the same lines as the Nikon Buckmaster. I have heard that there is not much to be had from going from the 40 to the 50 objective. That does not seem right but maybe?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I put a Nikon 40mm 3-9x on a Savage rifle recently, it was a 'Team Primos' scope from SWFA. $199. Supposed to be the same as last year's Monarch scope?Regardless, I really like it. Super for a hunting rifle. Very clear. Dead on and I like the BDC recticle.I've heard the 50mm vs 40mm debate myself, so I did some comparing with both at dusk. I could not tell a difference. The scopes were not the same model, however I could see no difference in brightness in low light conditions. My $0.02

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bushnell Elite series of scopes are really nice. they are bright & super sharp. I liked them so much, I bought three. I am very happy with them and I believe they are a much better buy than my Leupolds. Just a personal opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What ever you get, get it in a 40.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

middway has a great sale going on leupolds. I couldnt stand it and bought another vx-3. The only trouble is i like a dot and this one is duplex ,so i will send it in at some point and have it changed. I have bought direct from L eupold before and it takes months to get your order.. 399.00 for a vx3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Bushnell Elite series of scopes are really nice. they are bright & super sharp. I liked them so much, I bought three. I am very happy with them and I believe they are a much better buy than my Leupolds. Just a personal opinion.
+1 I have two of the browning 3-9x40's (basically re-badged 3200's) and I really like them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Long time ago I read that if you want more light, then pair the 50 MM objective with the 30 MM tube. Otherwise, you're wasting your money.:good:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'll stick with a 40mm- thanks for the help guys! I already ordered my scope mount for the AR in 1 inch. I am waiting to hear back from the dealer on what is in stock and what the current prices are. I am expecting the Bushnell to be a little cheaper, so I may give one of them a shot. I like the Nikons but have heard a lot of good things about the Bushnells. I do like that the buckmasters come with a sun shade. Thanks for the help!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Long time ago I read that if you want more light, then pair the 50 MM objective with the 30 MM tube. Otherwise, you're wasting your money.:good:
That's definately the ticket. :-) have that combo on my 1k .308 tac gun. VERY bright. That said, 50mm just doesnt work real well on all my guns. Fat barrels make it a bit too high. I wouldn't think that would be an issue on the AR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of a Nikon Bushmaster, try looking at the Leupold VX-I LR. For my eye it just much more sense to sight on cross hairs then a circle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out Burris Fullfield II 3-9x40 w/ bal plex reticle, great scope for the money, better quality than Bushnell. ,,300wsm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aquaelvis,A dandy scope for your AR would be the Leupold 2.5 - 8x VX III. Good for close up work and enough power for 300 yard coyotes. Good shooting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0